Here is the paragraph without the timestamps and numbers:

You know, the usual suspects, I’ll call them on the left in the media, is just, you know, again, not looking in the mirror. No, they think they didn’t call him Hitler loudly enough. Or that just a lot of people, like, texted me things like, well, you know, you can’t fix stupid. Sorry, that doesn’t work with me. Yeah, you’re stupid, because you’re not thinking about the bigger picture. You’re not thinking about maybe we did something wrong. Maybe we’re not perfect. America dumped you, and they’re all like, you don’t know what you had. Yes, they do. They know what they had, and what they’re saying is, we know what we had, and you’re right.

Alright, folks, so here’s the deal—Bill Maher is not holding back. In his latest jaw-dropping commentary, he’s taking aim at the smugness of the left-wing pundits who, let’s be honest, are kinda living in their own bubble. Think about it—how often do we see them doubling down on their mistakes, ignoring any self-reflection? Bill Maher’s here to call ’em out. He’s not mincing words, folks. He’s urging, like, a serious reality check. He’s highlighting how the left’s constant obsession with attacking Trump might just be their biggest Achilles’ heel. Now, is he on to something? You be the judge. And hey, if you enjoy content that challenges the norm and keeps it real, hit that subscribe button. Go on, I’ll wait… Done? Welcome aboard! Let’s dig deeper into this.

So, jumping right in, Bill Maher isn’t just giving us a laundry list of grievances against the left. No, he’s, like, really unpacking what’s wrong with their response to Trump’s presidency. See, Maher’s arguing that they’re just a little too obsessed—not in the healthy critique kind of way, but with an almost melodramatic hysteria that, to be honest, often backfires.

He’s pointing out that, sure, some critique is fair game. We’ve all seen the controversial tweets, the unpredictable policies, right? But Maher’s issue isn’t with holding Trump accountable; it’s more about how the left does it. You know, the constant alarm bells, the over-the-top rhetoric, and how they don’t stop to consider their own role in all this chaos.

Let’s think about, for instance, the media framing. Maher’s saying that, instead of being the cool-headed voices that many Americans need, left-wing pundits often act like they’re auditioning for a soap opera. It’s all drama, heightened emotions, but, hey, where’s the substance? That’s a question he’s repeatedly asking while emphasizing how this approach just deepens divisions instead of uniting.

Take the celebrity culture that seems to engulf political commentary on the left. Maher points out how, during Trump’s presidency, late-night hosts, actors, and even musicians wanted to become political analysts overnight. It’s like everyone wants their slice of the outrage pie, but what happens to serious political discussion? Basically, that stuff gets drowned out by noise, and Maher thinks it’s a dangerous game.

I saw Kamala was on Saturday Night Live, as the losing candidate often is. It worked so well for Hillary, let’s run that back. And it just made me think, I’m sure every single member of the Saturday Night Live cast was a Harris supporter. But what if one of them wasn’t? What if one of those cast members was for Trump? Would they have felt comfortable saying so? I really don’t think so. They would have had to keep it to themselves. That’s not a good place for us to be. I remember when… And that happens even more on the left.

And speaking of games, let’s talk bias, shall we? Maher brings out the receipts on how certain media outlets pretty much act like extensions of certain political campaigns. He suggests that they’re not exactly neutral. Remember that time when every single one of them seemed to be operating under the assumption that Clinton had the election in the bag? Maher argues that such overconfidence and disconnectedness led to shock and disbelief, and, remarkably, no lessons were learned, no humble pie was eaten.

Now, another thing Maher wants us to think about is the idea of intolerance—yes, you heard that right. He’s targeting the left’s claim to be the champions of tolerance and diversity of thought, yet often showing no patience or understanding for those who dare step out of their ideological line. The minute someone disagrees, it’s like, “Oh, you’re part of the problem.” But how is that helpful? Isn’t the whole point of a democratic society to have a bunch of voices, even those you totally cringe at?

And let’s not skip the part about permissibility of discussions, right? You know, that slightly frightening terrain where you’re navigating political correctness and walking on eggshells. Maher weighs in on how this culture is making everything so stringent. He’s like, “What in the world happened to just having an open debate?” Turns out, people are scared to speak their minds, fearing backlash or what if, God forbid, they told a joke? So much for free expression, huh?

Perhaps one of Maher’s most poignant observations revolves around the left’s inability or unwillingness to consider opposing views as sometimes valid—just sometimes, right? It’s problematic if all you do is point fingers, dismissing all alternative viewpoints as invalid or incompetent. Maher’s essentially advocating for some self-reflection, because maybe, just maybe, there are things worth listening to on the other side, issues that actually matter to millions of Americans.

From live shows to panel discussions, Maher consistently pricks at these uncomfortable truths. Just think back to when Elon Musk hosted “Saturday Night Live”—even before his politics became more noticeable, some cast members were in a tizzy. You and I will have to just respectfully disagree. I think if presidential candidates talking about people getting shot, he called for a military tribunal against her. He might not do it, but you want to normalize the notion that that’s the kind of language that we want to have. No, but that wasn’t, but you know, this is the problem with, I’m sorry, the far left is that. You’re not going to drag me into Trump derangement syndrome. It’s not deranged to be upset and worried about the real things. Like he could be a fascist. He wants to be a, I’m very, but if you’re going to think I’m going to chase every rabbit down the hole for the next four, wait a second for the next four years, you’re wrong. I’m not going to, I’m not telling you what to do for the next, that’s who he is. I’m just telling you, I did this once. I’m not going to do it again. You know, that’s who he is. If he talks about Arnold Palmer’s dick or he makes it or he says a bad word or says something that everybody thinks like there are shithole countries, I’m not going to lose my shit about it. I’m just not. Cause that is deranged. Not asking.

Isn’t it ironic? It’s like they had one of the world’s most impactful figures right there, but personal bias was too distracting. And I remember when Elon Musk hosted, and this is well before he was a Trumper. This is three or four years. He was just the richest man in the world. And a number of the cast members on Saturday Night Live, like, they wouldn’t, they didn’t want to deal with him. They didn’t exactly boycott, but they made it plain. And I was thinking, really? You have Elon Musk on your show for a week. You could talk to one of the most interesting, brilliant people the world has ever produced, even about this issue that bothers you so much, that he’s so rich and lots of people aren’t. You don’t want to even deal with him. That’s what I hate about the left.

And what about when Maher deftly navigates the panic surrounding Trump? He distinctly separates real concerns from paranoia. Don’t get him wrong—he’ll call out any damaging policy, but he’s urging for rational conversation instead of daily hysteria. Maher’s saying if you’re worried about Trump dismantling freedom or diving into authoritarian waters, ground those fears in facts, not baseless panic. Can’t we all agree that’s a sensible approach?

At this point, Bill Maher’s not asking for miracles or changes overnight. Just a bit more openness and a lot less arrogance—at least, that’s how he sees it. And honestly, that doesn’t seem like a huge ask, right? But it does require some honest introspection and real conversations across the field. Anyway, where do you stand on all this? Like, do you think Maher’s making some fair points, or is he missing the mark? I’m curious to hear how you’re processing this, so drop your thoughts in the comments below. Let’s keep this conversation going!